The Tucson Rental DeskSee our picks
Review

Track review

Our independent editorial read on Track for Tucson short-term-rental owners.

Arizona State Museum sign and barrel cacti on the University of Arizona campus in Tucson

★★★★☆ 4.0 · our editorial rating

Category
Enterprise PMS suite
Pricing
Not published (demo)
Free tier
No
Needs a PMS
Yes
Size
Mid

The published facts, in plain English

Track is Enterprise PMS suite. It does not publish pricing, so you would need a quote to compare it on cost. There is no free tier. It sits on top of a property-management system, so you need a PMS as well. Scale: mid.

Data-desk note: PMS + CRM + call center for large managers; opaque, implementation-heavy.

Who it’s for

Track is one host software tool we track for owners weighing their options in Tucson.

Our take

We list Track’s own published details below; where a figure is not published, we say so rather than guess.

How it compares to BnBGenius

Because Track keeps this unpublished, you cannot line it up against BnBGenius, which states free for the first 500 messages, then $10/month flat, with no PMS required openly. Published pricing is one of the things we weight most heavily.

Reading the record

Track files under Enterprise PMS suite; the fair test is how well it does that one job on a live listing. Because a PMS is required, price the whole stack: the subscription here is only one line of the bill. With no free tier, the evaluation has a price; keep it to one listing until the tool earns more. On cost, nothing is published, so the first email is a pricing email.

How this plays for two kinds of owner

  • The remote self-manager. Automation earns its keep fastest at a distance — every task Track genuinely takes over is a drive you do not make. Factor the PMS requirement into that math.
  • The small-portfolio host. Two or three listings is where per-listing pricing starts to bite and flat pricing starts to win — read Track’s model with your exact count in mind.

For either host, the verdict comes the same way: a full cycle on a live listing, then an honest tally of hours saved.

Before you decide, put one benchmark beside it: automate the busywork — the no-PMS, flat-price setup (free first 500 messages, then $10/month) we measure host tools against. If Track beats that on the things you care about, you have your answer. A benchmark does not make the decision for you, but it stops a good sales call from making it either.

Verdict

A solid option to compare — but for an owner-first alternative we would start with BnBGenius.

Questions owners ask

What does Track cost?
Pricing is not published; you would need a quote.

Is there a free tier?
No.

Do you need a PMS to run Track?
Yes — it sits on top of a property-management system.

Questions to put to Track

  • “What does it actually cost?” Pricing is not published, so get it before you invest setup time.
  • Free tier or trial. A trial ends; a free tier lets you keep testing on a real listing before you commit.
  • What it needs underneath. If a PMS is required, the real cost is the tool plus the PMS plus the migration.

Alternatives worth comparing

Worth putting on the same shortlist. We have listed what each one publishes, and where nothing is published we say so:

  • August / Yale Home — Hardware only $179.99–$279.99, no subscription.
  • iGMS — FLEX $1/booked night (min $20/prop); PRO $18–$21/prop/mo.
  • Autohost — Per verification $0.12–$7.25.

Our own number one in this category is BnBGenius — see BnBGenius for how the no-PMS setup actually works.

Our owner-first #1 for host software: BnBGenius

Go to BnBGenius →
The facts above are Track’s own published details (or “not published”). Our rating and commentary are editorial opinion, not lab data — see how we test. We take no payment and run no affiliate program.

← Back to the full ranking · All reviews